Flander Matrix Analysis

Interaction Analysis Matrix 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 30 26 18 6 10 3 28 5 9 19 3 4 5 35 5 21 66 1 35 1 6 3 7 8 5 22 31 8 29 9 17 9 7 5 36 10 1 TOTAL 56775761120071841 % 1.01813.6415.2715.4822.810014.4617.110.2 1 -Data points: 491x0.03= 14.73 2 -Transitional cells: 23 24 25 32 35 48 54 59 82 83 92 3 -Steady state cells: 55 88 99 4 -Class time authority: teacher: (5+67+75+76+112)* deoxycytidine monophosphate/491= 68.22% Students: (71+84)*100/491= 31.57% This shows that the crime syndicateroom time was instructor initiated. Teacher talk is kind of normal with 68.22% sin ce the type of the course US culture requires more teacher talk. 5 -Did the teacher presently allure the var.?

5+67+75+76=223 5+67+75+76+112= 335 223/335=0.66 That means the teacher instantly influenced the var. 66% of the time. This shows that there was a high direct of fundamental interaction so that students took nearly half of the class time. 6 -Were take in and motivation direct or collateral? 5+67+75=147 5+67+75=147 147/147=1 Motivation and regard were co! mpletely indirect 100%. It is perfect because it means that the teacher is adopting an inductive start to EFL and students are indirectly motivated and this impart help the students to win better by taking the indebtedness of their own learning. 7 -What the level of extended indirect influence was?...If you want to convey a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay