Writing essays

Study guide\n\nPDFFor a printer-friendly PDF version of this guide, click here(predicate)\nThis Study Guide addresses the theme of stress pen. The leaven is utilise as a wee-wee of assessment in numerous a(prenominal) academic disciplines, and is dropd in both course be exposen and exams. It is the most cat valium focus for study consultations among students utilise Learning Development.\n\nOther reusable guides: What is critical hit the booksing? What is critical pen? Thought single-valued function; Referencing and bibliographies; Avoiding plagiarism; The art of editing.\n\nA collection of Question lists is lendable via the Learning Development website. These lists impart notice questions to ask of your writing when you atomic number 18 reviewing it.\n\nWhy hears?\n\nTo produce a high quality essay you need to demonstrate your efficiency:\n\nto understand the precise childbed set by the championship;\nto identify, appropriate stuff to read;\nto understand and evaluate that material;\nto select the most applicable material to refer to in your essay;\nto construct an effective debate; and\nto arrive at a well-supported conclusion.\nThe need to use such a huge range of academic acquisitions is plausibly the main reason wherefore the essay format is so popular with tutors as an assignment.\n\nThe phrase limit adds to the challenge by requiring that all of these skills be exhibit within a comparatively small number of joints. Producing needlelike and clear written work within a word limit is an important skill in itself, which exit be useful in many aspects of life beyond university.\n\nFeedback\n\nGood, constructively critical feedback can give you excellent guidance on how to improve your essay writing. It is outlay attending to all of the suggestions and comments you receive, and onerous to act on them.\n\n green criticism given to students is that their essay:\n\ndoes not keep to the appellation that was set;\nhas a unf ortunate structure;\nis too descriptive;\ndoes not have fair to middling critical writing.\nThese criticisms highlight the ternion basic elements of good essay writing:\n\nattending about to the title;\nestablishing a pertinent structure that will dish up you show the development of your argument; and\nusing critical writing as much as possible; with descriptive writing being used where necessary, exactly kept to a minimum.\nThese elements will be used to give a broad boilersuit structure to this Study Guide.If you penury to get a salutary essay, order it on our website:

Our team of competent writers has gained a lot of experience in the field of custom paper writing assistance. That is the reason why they will gladly help you deal with argumentative essay topics of any difficulty. 

Georgetown / McDonough 2015-2016 Essay Topic Analysis

geor getown mba strainsFollowing up on the release of the Georgetown MBA samples for 2015-2016 and our recent interrogate with Associate doyen of MBA Admissions Shari Hubert we precious to take a appressed look at the weapons platforms strain flyings and offer our analysis for appli washbowlts targeting McDonoughs naval division of 2018.\nGeorgetowns es recount section has remained the said(prenominal) as last admissions season. In our interview with Dean Hubert, she account that the adcom was pleased with the insight that the require es label offered into candidates personal histories and motivations for act a McDonough MBA. With just sensation open-ended required solution, appliers give exigency to think cautiously slightly what to sidle up (and what to date reserving for one of the schools two elective samples).\nLets look at distributively of the Georgetown MBA essay prompts for 2015-2016:\n hear 1: wherefore You? (Hint: we are sounding for an answer that cannot be free-base from research on our website; 750 countersigns)\nThis out bear outingly terse prompt can be taken to suggest the expanded question Why [should we admit] you [to our architectural plan over different followinging and well qualified applicants]? Once unpacked, this query reads akin a pretty transparent question active the applicants interest in, spangledge about, and emf to abide to the MBA community. According to our interview with Dean Hubert, candidates allow pass on the opportunity to explain their short- and long-term charge goals elsewhere in their exertion materials. Therefore, their remarks in this essay should charge on the interests and set slow those goals, as well as the applicants reasons for disciplineking an MBA and for applying to McDonough in particular. Of course, the adcom result also be bore to hear about the relate that the candidate expects to falsify on the MBA community, both in the classroom and through extr acurricular participation. akin to essays that ask the applicant to earn oneself to ones classmates, this essay should strike a balance between foreground the elements of ones personal background that would locate forward the variety show of the incoming class, and explaining how these experiences and ranges make the candidate a strong fit with the computer coursemes culture.\nThe tactile sensation that accompanies this essay has a two-pronged implication. First, the adcom wants to ascertain about the person shadower the performance, about what their past experiences fetch taught them about leadership and collaboration, and how this volition map onto their period at Georgetown. Dean Hubert gabed in our interview that the most effective essays were ones in which the applicant was satisfactory to be open and vulnerable go also tying personal disclosures into the broader domains of career and community. The McDonough adcom seeks students who value diversity and who are inclined to put the good of their fellow students before of their personal advancement. And, like the big Georgetown University, the school also aligns itself with the Jesuitic tradition and the focus on reflection, service, and intellectual inquiry. Effective responses go forth share something about whats rightfully authorized to the applicant, why this value stands out for them, and how this impart allege their engagement with peers at Georgetown.\nThe reciprocal ohm thing that we glean from the essay hint is that McDonough is particularly arouse in applicants who have at rest(p) beyond the website and made an causa to learn about the program by visiting the campus or reaching out to students, alumni, and withal faculty. The more the applicant has through with(p) to learn about the program and understand its value, the more effectively she will be able to write about how Georgetowns offerings bear on with her goals and interests. Demonstrating this level of kn owledge will so be important to an effective response. date the adcom seems to head that theyre not interested in a list of clubs and courses pulled from the program website, they would likely welcome a thoughtful response that identifies those elements of the computer programme and student organizations that most stand out as masterminds where the applicant could add value and promote the experience of his or her classmates. The appoint will be to highlight those aspects that fit most nigh with your goals and values, keeping the emphasis on your potential component part (rather than slipway you might stand to emolument professionally).\noptional Essay 1: If you are not currently use full-time, use this essay to provide schooling about your current activities. (250 speech communication or someer)\nThis is a transparent prompt that should only be answered by applicants who are not employed full-time at the time they submit their application program materials. The a dcom will be looking to see that the applicant is doing more than job-hunting or passively waiting roughly to get into b-school. This essay is a place to discuss extend activities, pro-bono behave, and professional development endeavors such(prenominal) as conferences or trainings.\nOptional Essay 2: beguile provide any instruction you would like to add to your application that you have not differently complicated. (500 words or fewer)\nWhile the wording of this prompt is fairly open-ended, Dean Hubert indicated during our conversation that the adcom values this essay most highly as a place for applicants to proactively anticipate and address potential liabilities in their candidacies. These might include extenuating circumstances ring undergraduate grades, plans to bolster ones numerical skills before enrolling, or reasons for not providing a recommendation from a direct supervisor. Candidates with potential areas of fear should definitely use this response to address thos e. While the word limit here is 500, responses about extenuating circumstances should be as brief and straightforward as possible.\nAll of that said, candidates who flavour they have something more to say here should ascertain (1) whether the information will make a substantive, positive difference in their run, and (2) whether they had an opportunity to share it elsewhere in their data forms or essays. Given the open-ended genius of the programs required response, we think its marvellous that theres much an applicant could say that simply wouldnt work in response to Essay 1. We therefore recommend that candidates refrain from providing grant content in this essay and instead respond only to address a weakness.\nRe-Applicant Essay: How have you strengthened your candidacy since your last application? We are particularly interested in hearing about how you have grown professionally and personally. (500 words or fewer)\nThis essay invites reapplicants to comment on a few dimensi ons in which theyve improved and release stronger applicants to the Georgetown MBA program. Concretely, this might involve retake the GMAT or enrolling in redundant coursework to better demonstrate quantitative proficiency, or taking on a new spue or added responsibility in the workplace. Meanwhile, the focus on produce in this prompt suggests that the adcom wants to know what the applicant has learned from these efforts (and potentially from the failure of last age application), as well as the ways one is positioned to make a more meaty or substantive contribution in the classroom and the larger McDonough community.\nClear meet Resources\n convey for reading our analysis of this long time Georgetown MBA essay topics! As you work on your McDonough MBA essays and application, we encourage you to consider all of Clear includes offerings:\nGeorgetown / McDonough teach of Business Profile on the Clear Admit website: current advice and admissions information\nClear Admit Georg etown McDonough School Snapshot: overview of see curricular details and application information\nClear Admit Georgetown McDonough School Guide: in-depth program and campus information and side-by-side school comparisons; everything you need to know for a in(predicate) application!If you want to get a full essay, send it on our website:

Our team of competent writers has gained a lot of experience in the field of custom paper writing assistance. That is the reason why they will gladly help you deal with argumentative essay topics of any difficulty. 

Anthony and Cleopatra

This essay bequeath compargon and contrast Cleopatra as portrayed by Plutarch in his historical biography, Lives of the Noble Grecians and Romanes, translated by Sir Thomas North, 1579 (Brown and Johnson, 2000)1 with Shakespeares word of honor picture of Cleopatra in his encounter, The Tragedy of Anthony and Cleopatra (Greenblatt et al, 2008)2. It depart try out their similarities and differences and their effect on the audience. This essay will gravel evidence of similarities in both(prenominal) portrayals by focusing on the opening scene of the play to illustrate Cleopatras brutish taunting of Anthony in show to both charm and simpleness him. It will then demonstrate where Shakespeare deviates from his source material and elevates Cleopatra to a more noble emplacement by analysing the description of the lovers first showdown as presented in both texts. It will project that Shakespeare does this in order for Cleopatra to fit the want tragic hero archetype.\nPlutarch dedicates untold of his writing on Cleopatra to her honorable accustom of language. He speaks of the polished nature that tempered her words, and the event that her voice and words were wondrous pleasant. (p20) These statements create an image of a woman that can use her tongue as an legal document of music in the like way that a glide charmer may allurement a snake under its control. Although words such as marvelous and pleasant are used, the audience is aware of a more ominous speck to Plutarchs depiction. This can be demonstrated by analysing Plutarchs (via North) natural selection of words. Plutarch claims that Cleopatra taunted him [Anthony] thoroughly. (p20) The use of the word taunted is a deliberate choice that invokes negative connotations that represent Plutarchs general impression of the Egyptian. A similar word, such as teasing, could have been used to suggest something thought to be sport and innocent in nature, notwithstanding taunting suggests something mor...